Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » Derailer
Re: Derailer [message #206 is a reply to message #205] Tue, 21 October 2008 10:26 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Ren Schnemann is currently offline  Ren Schnemann
Messages: 3
Registered: October 2008
Junior Member
Definitely no objections. It may still useful to have them.
Thanks for the help.

Best regards,
René Schönemann

"Dr. Volker Knollmann" <coord(at)infrastructurerailmlorg> schrieb im
Newsbeitrag news:gdih2g$jb0$1(at)sifaivifhgde...
> On 20/10/08 14:03, René Schönemann wrote:
>> today we disussed about derailers and their handling in RailML. Version
>> 1.1
>> does not contain anything about derailers but Version 0.9 did. So, does
>> anybody know where they went to?
>
> Uh-oh.... I can't remember any reason why we could have intentionally
> deleted them. If the break occurs between V0.9 and V1.0 it is likely
> that we made a mistake when we prepared the release 1.0.
>
> Since I'm just preparing a new "mini-release" of the infrastructure
> schema for the next days, I can use that chance to re-include them.
>
> Any objections?
>
> Best regards,
> Volker Knollmann
>
> --
> Dr. Volker Knollmann
> RailML Infrastructure Coordinator
> EMail: coord(at)infrastructurerailmlorg
>
>
> Business contact:
>
> Siemens AG
> Industry Sector
> I MO RA SPP SM21
> Ackerstr. 22
> 38126 Braunschweig
> Tel.: +49 (531) 226-2592
> mailto:volkerknollmann(at)siemenscom

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: simple Infrastructure scheme usage as a base for Timetable reference
Next Topic: New developer version V1.1.1 released
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat May 11 23:00:29 CEST 2024