Re: [railML3] Restrictions [message #3076 is a reply to message #3062] |
Mon, 24 April 2023 22:38 |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 463 Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear David,
the current implementation of the <restrictionArea> is rather basic, which means that it is not possible to group restriction areas forming "parent" restriction areas. Apart from the statement that railML 3.2 does not provide "business objects" build on top of restriction areas, I want to ask the rest of the community about their experiences with restriction areas and their implementation. If there is interest from several sides, we may not only think about a user-specific extension, but we may also consider a schema enhancement...
As usual, any comments are highly appreciated.
Best regards
Christian
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|