Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » [railML3] Suggestion for sub-use cases of use case "ETCS Track Net" (Suggestion to consider sub-use cases in the use case "ETCS Track Net")
Re: [railML3] Suggestion for sub-use cases of use case "ETCS Track Net" [message #3043 is a reply to message #3041] Mon, 09 January 2023 18:50 Go to previous message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear all,

as there has been no further requests on the ETCS use case tailoring
approach, I herewith confirm the approach with ETCS-a, ETCS-b and ETCS-c
as described in Martin's posting. The adaptation of related wiki pages
about ETCS use case will be done by mid January.

Best regards
Christian

Christian Rahmig - Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org e.V. (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany

Am 11.11.2022 um 09:21 schrieb Christian Rahmig:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to remind you on Martin's request to comment on
> the suggested ETCS use case tailoring. So, if you have any
> questions or remarks or alternative suggestions on splitting
> the ETCS use case into sub-use cases, please share them with
> the railML community here in the forum.
>
> Thank you very much and best regards
> Christian

Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [railML 2] IS:005 - ocp/@parentOcpRef Semantic Constraint
Next Topic: [railML3] Need to specify "Stock rail joint" as position point for switch
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun May 05 12:00:29 CEST 2024