| Re: [railML2] bridge type [message #3004 is a reply to message #2899] |
Tue, 17 May 2022 12:48  |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Torben,
thank you very much for your proposal and ideas on harmonizing bridge model approaches in railML 2 and railML 3.
I appreciate the idea to define an enum attribute to distinguish between "overCrossing" and "underCrossing" as you already explained. This attribute should be named the same for both elements, the <brigde> and the <tunnel>. Since the attribute @kind in <tunnel> is used to define the material of the tunnel walls (which is important for calculating the tunnel resistance factor), the attribute @kind is maybe not the best option. But what about @functionalType to be added to <tunnel> and <brigde>?
I would like to invite the community to contribute their opinions to the discussion. Any feedback is highly appreciated...
Best regards
Christian Rahmig
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
