Home » railML newsgroups » railml.interlocking » railML 3.2: Overlap/flank protection variants
Re: railML 3.2: Overlap/flank protection variants [message #2863 is a reply to message #2862] Wed, 15 December 2021 16:04 Go to previous message
Jörg von Lingen is currently offline  Jörg von Lingen
Messages: 89
Registered: March 2016
Member
Hi,

the route destination is define by its routeExit element. This can have [0..*]
overlap child elements. Thus it is possible to define several overlaps for one
route.

The flank protection can be explicitely defined only by references from the
route to routeReleation elements. However, if you want to define different flank
protections for different overlaps, there is no mean to differentiate the
relation to any particular overlap. In that case it would be the best to define
a route for each overlap.


Best regards,
Joerg v. Lingen - Interlocking Coordinator
 
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [railML3]: Defining the <overlap> element
Next Topic: [railML3.2] dublicate element name itinerary
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jul 23 13:43:27 CEST 2024