Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » Link a "doubleSwitchCrossing" to two switchesIL (Special Scenario for Treating a "dobleSwitchCrossing" differently in system landscape)
Re: Link a "doubleSwitchCrossing" to two switchesIL [message #2933 is a reply to message #2928] Mon, 07 March 2022 09:08 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear all,

first of all thank you Thomas for summarizing your feedback from last workshop with Bane NOR on this topic of switch crossings. From your comments I concluded the following proposal:
* double switch crossings are modelled with a <switchIS>@type="doubleSwitchCrossing"
* single switch crossings are modelled with a <switchIS>@type="singleSwitchCrossing"
* switch crossings can be modelled as composition of switch parts or as single elements
* switch crossing parts are modelled with a <switchIS>@type="switchCrossingPart"
* switch crossing parts shall reference the switch crossing they belong to via @belongsToParent

Dear community, please let us know if you have any doubts with this adapted proposal. Its implementation is foreseen with upcoming railML 3.2. Any feedback is highly appreciated...

Best regards
Christian

Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [railML3] Grouping IS:trainProtectionElement-s
Next Topic: Function location
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat May 04 11:07:31 CEST 2024