Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » [railML2] extension suggestion for the element <state> for working zones
Re: [railML2] extension suggestion for the element <state> for working zones [message #2801 is a reply to message #2792] Fri, 30 July 2021 19:03 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear all,

following adaptations linked with Trac ticket #393 (re-naming <area> into <genericArea> and introducing <workingArea> etc.) [1] I updated railML 2.5 solution proposal for the additional running time in Trac ticket #395 [2]. Please review and let us know if you discover issues to be discussed / corrected / adapted...

Further, one of the two challenges mentioned in my previous post remains and awaits your qualified feedback:
* A direction dependency as modelled with <additionalRunningTime>@dir is not feasible with areas that span over several tracks having different directions. How to cope with this situation?

Any kind of example or comment is highly appreciated...

[1] https://trac.railml.org/ticket/393
[2] https://trac.railml.org/ticket/395

Best regards
Christian

Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [railML2] Adding a new element informationArea to ocp
Next Topic: [railML3] rail3:netElement.relation seems useless
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu May 02 16:06:47 CEST 2024