Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » [railML2] extension suggestion for the element <state> for working zones
Re: [railML2] extension suggestion for the element <state> for working zones [message #2792 is a reply to message #2766] Fri, 16 July 2021 14:56 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear Torben,
dear all,

based on Trac ticket #395 [1] I implemented the <additionalRunningTime> within <area> as a first version. In that context, the following challenges should be considered in the discussion:
* A direction dependency as modelled with <additionalRunningTime>@dir is not feasible with areas that are not directly linked with tracks, e.g. an information area around an OCP.
* A direction dependency as modelled with <additionalRunningTime>@dir is not feasible with areas that span over several tracks having different directions.

So, we should clarify it once again: for which scenarios the <additionalRunningTime> (with direction dependency) is needed? Can you provide an example? Any comments are highly appreciated...

[1] https://trac.railml.org/ticket/395

Best regards
Christian

Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [railML2] Adding a new element informationArea to ocp
Next Topic: [railML3] rail3:netElement.relation seems useless
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu May 02 22:06:18 CEST 2024