Home » railML newsgroups » railml.rollingstock » [railML2] Do we need a solution to declare the states of rolling stock? (<states>)
[railML2] Re: Do we need a solution to declare the states of rolling stock? [message #2810 is a reply to message #2582] Wed, 18 August 2021 10:23 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Carsten Weber is currently offline  Carsten Weber
Messages: 27
Registered: November 2011
Junior Member
Dear community,
dear Torben,

in my eyes your suggestion makes sense. Bound a data field like status
to the vehicle so that you can check whether it is one current in use or
it is only an idea or whatever. Maybe it should be checked before
whether all entries of the infrastructure field could be taken one by one.

Best regards.

Carsten Weber
Bahnberatung Carsten Weber

In Zusammenarbeit mit

iRFP e.K.
Institut für Regional- und Fernverkehrsplanung
Hochschulstraße 45
01069 Dresden

Am 11.11.2020 um 10:57 schrieb Torben Brand:
> Dear railML-community,
>
> We have had a previous mishap where the wrong vehicle (and
> formation that is built on the vehicle) was used for runtime
> calculations. This as the same vehicle was in several
> versions in the same database/railML exchange file. The
> different versions were due to different states of the
> vehicle. In an early stage the vehicle was conceptual with
> "glossy marketing paper" values from the vendor. At a later
> stage the vehicle was planned and the values dropped/got
> more realistic. Finally, when the vehicle was in operation
> the values where investigated and found to be even lower.
> To mitigate this source of potential error and to transmit
> more information in railML should we consider adding a
> construct like <states> under infrastructure (example:
> https://wiki2.railml.org/wiki/IS:state) in rolling stock?
> Or do you suggest it's enough to demand from the user to
> transmit information outside railML of which correct vehicle
> to be used, to describe the vehicle further in the
> human-readable @description attribute or to purge the
> dataset transmitted on the desired state of vehicles (for
> instance only operational vehicles in data set)?
>
> What does the community think? Any feedback is highly
> appreciated.
>
> Kind regards
>
>
> Torben Brand
> Jernbanedirektoratet

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Distinguish between physical and operational
Next Topic: [railML3.2] Cant Deficiency Class for RS and/or TT
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Apr 26 20:31:45 CEST 2024