| Re: [railML3] How to Indicate a working process when doing a signal redesign. [message #2607 is a reply to message #2567] |
Fri, 04 December 2020 15:56  |
Thomas Nygreen
Messages: 68
Registered: March 2008
|
Member |
|
|
Dear all,
To recap a little: This issue was already raised by Torben three years ago. Christian created a trac ticket for it and suggested an implementation as an element rather than an attribute (in a railML 2 context). The equivalent in railML 3 would probably be an implementation similar to <elementStates>, e.g. called <elementsChanged>, where elements can be referenced and given a change type.
I have talked with Georg, who started this thread, and this feature is important in the exchange between (internal or external) signal engineers when planning a new signalling system to replace and existing one, or when planning modifications to the existing signalling system. Any comments regarding implementing this in railML 3 are most welcome!
Best regards,
Thomas
Thomas Nygreen – Common Schema Coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
