Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » Introduction of speedChangeGroups required?
Re: Introduction of speedChangeGroups required? [message #165 is a reply to message #164] Thu, 13 October 2005 13:49 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Volker Knollmann is currently offline  Volker Knollmann
Messages: 32
Registered: October 2003
Member
On 10.10.2005 11:29, Matthias Hengartner wrote:
>> 2) How to keep comptability with the version 1.0? Should the old
>> <speedChange>-element be kept untouched?
>

> My original idea was to leave the original <speedChange>-element and add the
> <speedChangeGroup>-element as an additional possibility (similar to
> signal/balise groups).

Hmmm... two different elements for almost the same purpose?

> --> Where should we place the attribute "dir"? As an attribute of
> <speedChangeGroup> (as above) or as an attribute of the single
> <aSpeedChange>-elements?

That points me to a slightly more general question. Image the following
static speed profile for a train of an arbitrary train category:



^ v
|
|
| 80 km/h
+---------------------+
| |
| |
| | 40 km/h
| +----------------
|
|
|
+---------------------|-------------------------> s
s0

---> "up"-direction



Which railML-elements would you introduce at position s0?

A speed change to 40 km/h valid in up-direction?
Plus a speed change to 80 km/h in down-direction?

A speed change to 40 km/h with implicit assumption of a speed change to
80 km/h in opposite direction? (Attention: speed changes are often not
"symmetrically"!)

An extended <speedChange>-element with two v-attributes: vMaxUp,
vMaxDown? This would be incompatible to V1.0, btw!

Anything else?


The more I think about this example, the more I guess we need not only a
clear definition and documentation of the SYNTAX, but also of the
SEMANTICS...

What do you think?


Remember: Answers to this posting in German are as welcome as answers in
English! Don't hesitate to tell us your opinion!


Best regards,
Volker Knollmann
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [IL] Contents and structure of interlocking schema
Next Topic: [IL] Ideas about interlocking schema
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 09 07:32:44 CEST 2024