Forum: railml.timetable » blockPart mission="other:..."

Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » blockPart mission="other:..." (A consumer can't handle inspection, instead suggests "other:...")

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: blockPart mission="other:..." [message #2389 is a reply to message #2373]

Tue, 10 March 2020 15:26

Milan Wölke
Messages: 141
Registered: April 2007

Senior Member

Hi Stefan and Dirk,

I completely agree with what Dirk said. In general an enumeration should not be extended if there is a standardized value available already. However in certain cases there may be the need for further distinction. But that would need to be explained. Certification actually checks for issues like this in particular.

Best regards, Milan

Milan Wölke – Timetable scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org

[Updated on: Mon, 06 April 2020 20:55]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		blockPart mission="other:..." By: Stefan de Konink on Thu, 05 March 2020 23:41
		Re: blockPart mission="other:..." By: Dirk Bräuer on Mon, 09 March 2020 10:25
		Re: blockPart mission="other:..." By: Milan Wölke on Tue, 10 March 2020 15:26

Previous Topic:	forgotten attribute <operatingPeriod> @dayOffset and its future
Next Topic:	Extension of Enum @trainUsage of <category>

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon May 13 12:58:47 CEST 2024