Forum: railML.infrastructure » [railML3] missing @ruleCode?

Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » [railML3] missing @ruleCode? (railML3, @ruleCode)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: [railML3] missing @ruleCode? [message #2363 is a reply to message #2361]

Sat, 29 February 2020 05:10

Jörg von Lingen
Messages: 87
Registered: March 2016

Member

Just a remark.
If you speaking about the "coded name" of a signal aspect, the it shall be placed in the definition of the <hasAspect>
for the <specificIM>.

Regards,
Jörg von Lingen - Interlocking Coordinator
Christian Rahmig wrote on 28.02.2020 16:12:
> I agree with Jörg: the content of railML 2 attribute
> @ruleCode seems to be better located in the interlocking
> domain of the signal since it refers to aspects the signal
> can show.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[railML3] missing @ruleCode? By: Torben Brand on Tue, 25 February 2020 11:37
		Re: [railML3] missing @ruleCode? By: Jörg von Lingen on Fri, 28 February 2020 06:33
		Re: [railML3] missing @ruleCode? By: christian.rahmig on Fri, 28 February 2020 16:12
		Re: [railML3] missing @ruleCode? By: Jörg von Lingen on Sat, 29 February 2020 05:10
		Re: [railML3] missing @ruleCode? By: Thomas Nygreen on Wed, 04 March 2020 19:35
		Re: [railML3] missing @ruleCode? By: Dominik Looser on Wed, 25 March 2020 11:01
		Re: [railML3] missing @ruleCode? By: christian.rahmig on Sat, 19 February 2022 23:48
		Re: [railML3] missing @ruleCode? By: Torben Brand on Fri, 18 March 2022 12:46
		Re: [railML3] missing @ruleCode? By: christian.rahmig on Fri, 18 March 2022 13:26
		Re: [railML3] missing @ruleCode? By: Torben Brand on Fri, 18 March 2022 14:07

Previous Topic:	[railML3] Loading gauge profile
Next Topic:	[railML3] Identifiers in Infrastructure

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri May 03 07:23:23 CEST 2024