| Re: Semantic constraints for <upTime> [message #2688 is a reply to message #2344] |
Thu, 25 March 2021 15:39   |
Vasco Paul Kolmorgen
Messages: 60
Registered: November 2004
|
Member |
|
|
Dear all!
Am 25.02.2020 um 10:46 schrieb Torben Brand:
> Excellent! This explains a lot! Could you post the
> definitions to the wiki?
As the semantic constraints IS:008, IS:009 and IS:010 are in the
railML's wiki (https://wiki2.railml.org/index.php?title=IS:uptime) since
more than a year without objection I suggest to set the status of these
to "accepted".
Please let us know up to April 15th, if this is not okay for you.
Best regards,
--
Vasco Paul Kolmorgen - Governance Coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Phone railML.org: +49 351 47582911
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
