Forum: railML.infrastructure » Extension suggestion for <upTime>

Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » Extension suggestion for <upTime> (uptime, railML 2.4nor, railML2.5, railML3 development)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Extension suggestion for <upTime> [message #2675 is a reply to message #2355]

Mon, 08 March 2021 11:07

christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016

Senior Member

Dear Torben,

I filed a Trac ticket for the remaining issue of clarifying OCP state and OCP uptime and their harmonisation. Please see [1]

[1] https://trac.railml.org/ticket/467

Best regards
Christian

Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Extension suggestion for <upTime> By: Torben Brand on Mon, 17 February 2020 15:06
		Description of <upTime>@mode (Re: Extension suggestion for <upTime>) By: Vasco Paul Kolmorgen on Fri, 21 February 2020 21:40
		Re: Description of <upTime>@mode (Re: Extension suggestion for <upTime>) By: Torben Brand on Tue, 25 February 2020 10:46
		Re: Description of <upTime>@mode By: Ferri Leberl on Fri, 28 February 2020 16:00
		Re: Semantic constraints for <upTime> By: Vasco Paul Kolmorgen on Thu, 25 March 2021 15:39
		Re: Extension suggestion for <upTime> By: christian.rahmig on Wed, 26 February 2020 21:58
		Re: Extension suggestion for <upTime> By: christian.rahmig on Mon, 08 March 2021 11:07

Previous Topic:	Suggested extension for operating rules
Next Topic:	Re: [railML3]: special infrastructure in IL - bascule bridge, tunnel gates

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Apr 30 05:06:42 CEST 2024