Forum: railML.infrastructure » [railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation

Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » [railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: [railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation [message #2368 is a reply to message #2359]

Wed, 04 March 2020 17:30

Thomas Nygreen
Messages: 68
Registered: March 2008

Member

Dear all,

I deleted @code from the signal example, as the way it was used is not in accordance with Dev:identities.

I considered editing the codes into something random, but I concluded that it would not contribute anything to the example.

Thomas Nygreen – Common Schema Coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org

[Updated on: Wed, 04 March 2020 17:36]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation By: Tobias Bregulla on Sat, 25 January 2020 14:50
		Re: [railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation By: Torben Brand on Tue, 25 February 2020 10:21
		Re: [railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation By: Thomas Nygreen on Wed, 26 February 2020 16:59
		Re: [railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation By: christian.rahmig on Wed, 26 February 2020 20:00
		Re: [railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation By: Ferri Leberl on Fri, 28 February 2020 15:56
		Re: [railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation By: Thomas Nygreen on Wed, 04 March 2020 17:30

Previous Topic:	extension of <levelCrossing> in railML2.4nor
Next Topic:	the use of @dir in railML.

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri May 03 23:48:10 CEST 2024