Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » Station borders
Re: Station borders [message #2385 is a reply to message #2366] Mon, 09 March 2020 22:01 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Dirk Bräuer is currently offline  Dirk Bräuer
Messages: 311
Registered: August 2008
Senior Member
Dear Thomases and Christian,

> As Dirk has pointed out a couple of times, station borders may be direction-dependent.[1][2]

Thank you, that's exactly what I wanted to mention right now... ;-)

Not only this: There are also several different definitions of station borders at the same time. (In Germany: interlocking, operational and traffic definitions are often different. Several operational stations can form one traffic station, as Berlin Hbf oben + unten + S-Bahn. One operational stations can also consist of several traffic stations, as Dresden Hbf / Mitte / Neustadt. The interlocking borders are wider that the operational borders typically when stations are remote-controlled. But also the other way round, one large operational station can be split into several interlocking areas, as it always was the case for Leipzig Hbf (Prussian / Saxon signal boxes strictly separated) and even nowadays still is (several ESTWs).

All together: When defining station borders, always allow a definition which kind of border type is meant and allow definitions depending on direction.

Dirk.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [railML 3.1] level crossing parameters
Next Topic: Ontology for RailML 3.1.
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Apr 29 03:21:20 CEST 2024