Forum: railML.infrastructure » Suggested extension for operating rules

Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » Suggested extension for operating rules (<nor:operatingRules>)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: [railML3] Suggested extension for operating rules [message #2453 is a reply to message #2392]

Thu, 04 June 2020 11:48

Morten Johansen
Messages: 9
Registered: February 2017

Junior Member

Dear Christian

I have asked some collegues in Bane NOR for their possible need to be able to communicate operating rules in railML. From their answers I have the impression that handling operating rules is of interest for elements in the Infrastructure and the TimeTable schema, and probably in the Interlocking schema as well.

Based on that the answer to your question should be that the elements for operating rules should be placed in the common part of the schema.

Best regards
Morten

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Suggested extension for operating rules By: Torben Brand on Wed, 04 December 2019 16:13
		Re: Suggested extension for operating rules By: christian.rahmig on Fri, 06 December 2019 20:54
		Re: Suggested extension for operating rules By: Thomas Nygreen on Wed, 26 February 2020 17:11
		Re: [railML3] Suggested extension for operating rules By: Jörg von Lingen on Wed, 11 March 2020 06:34
		Re: [railML3] Suggested extension for operating rules By: Morten Johansen on Thu, 04 June 2020 11:48
		Re: [railML3] Suggested extension for operating rules By: Thomas Nygreen on Thu, 25 March 2021 12:47

Previous Topic:	[railML3] ElectrificationSystem
Next Topic:	Extension suggestion for <upTime>

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun May 05 21:19:18 CEST 2024