| Re: Suggested extension for operating rules [message #2352 is a reply to message #2288] |
Wed, 26 February 2020 17:11   |
Thomas Nygreen
Messages: 68
Registered: March 2008
|
Member |
|
|
Dear Torben,
Dear Christian,
The rules that Torben link to concern how the infrastructure can be used. As such, they may belong with interlocking (in 3.x)?
Unlike the rules in the link, the example that Torben provides above, is to me not a rule, but a comment or information about a property of the infrastructure. It is maybe best handled as some kind of annotation on the signal element.
Another example, which is more like a rule is the following extract from the page Torben linked to:
Shunting signal R11
The driver of a vehicle shall always report to the local dispatcher. Train radio shall be used for the communication. If the way is free then permission will be given by shunting signal R11 using aspect 44 "Cautious shunting allowed" or aspect 45 "Shunting allowed".
I think this could be solved in the way Torben proposes, or very similarly by referencing the rule from a route element (in 3.x), where it would be a kind of verbal constraint on the route.
Best,
Thomas
Thomas Nygreen – Common Schema Coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
