| Re: @categoryPriority of <category> in version 2.5 / Extension of train part [message #2348 is a reply to message #2332] |
Wed, 26 February 2020 11:58   |
Milan Wölke
Messages: 146
Registered: April 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Janne,
thanks for the explanation. With type integer this makes a lot more sense. From my point of view the best solution here would be to declare @categoryPriority deprecated as it simply isnt clear how to use it. In consequence data exchange regarding this attribute is not really possible without additional coordination between the two data exchange partners. In order to distinguish two versions of the same train a rank attribute sounds reasonable. However there are two questions I see here:
1) trainPart or category? I guess this depends on how the simulation system classifies the data. I think, trainPart would be more flexible, though.
2) is this related to the status/processStatus thread we have? basically this is also different versions of a train.
I suggest to discuss those questions in the next developer telco.
Best regards, Milan
Milan Wölke – Timetable scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
[Updated on: Wed, 26 February 2020 12:00] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
