Home » railML newsgroups » railml.rollingstock » Different ways to model tractive effort (How to enter discrete, hyperbolic or quadratic tractive effort curves?)
Re: Different ways to model tractive effort [message #2534 is a reply to message #2158] Mon, 14 September 2020 09:13 Go to previous message
Joerg von Lingen is currently offline  Joerg von Lingen
Messages: 148
Registered: May 2011
Senior Member
Dear all,

it has been implemented for railML2.5 and described in wiki http://wiki2.railml.org/wiki/RS:segmentTable_tractiveEffort

--
Regards,
Jörg von Lingen - Rollingstock Coordinator

Thomas Nygreen wrote on 05.03.2019 14:20:
> Dear all,
>
> The current railML2 valueTable could support any of the
> segmented functions listed by Laura and Jörg, if we for
> each row apply the formula
> F = Sum ( y_z * v^z ) for all z
> where each value for z is given by columnHeader@zValue.
>
> If no column header is found and only one column is given,
> we would assume z = 0, meaning that F = y. This allows
> programs to keep listing the tractive effort for small speed
> steps.
>
> This approach would support any polynomial function, such as
> constant (only z=0), linear (0 and 1), quadratic (0, 1, 2)
> and cubic (0, 1, 2, 3), the simple hyperbolic (-1, 0) and
> quadratic hyperbolic (-2) listed by Laura and Jörg, and
> other simple rational functions where there is no shift of
> the x variable.
>
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: railML3: vehicle vs. vehiclePart - needed attributes
Next Topic: Infrastructure data for a train path finding tool
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Apr 28 11:10:57 CEST 2024