| Re: swicthType "interlacedSwitch" in IL [message #2122 is a reply to message #2102] |
Mon, 28 January 2019 11:10   |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Jörg,
dear all,
Am 16.01.2019 um 12:21 schrieb Joerg von Lingen:
> [...]
> in the IL schema we have currently the possibility to mark a switch as type "interlacedSwitch" with relation to another
> switch because they both might have a dependency for interlocking operation. This particular type is currently not
> forseen in IS at all. Do we need this type?
> [...]
it seems that there is no need for the "interlaced switch" at the
moment. Thus, I recommend to skip this topic for railML 3.1.
Best regards
Christian
--
Christian Rahmig - Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Phone Coordinator: +49 173 2714509; railML.org: +49 351 47582911
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railml.org
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
