Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » switchType IS vs. IL
switchType IS vs. IL [message #2099] Wed, 16 January 2019 12:16 Go to previous message
Jörg von Lingen is currently offline  Jörg von Lingen
Messages: 89
Registered: March 2016
Member
Dear all,

currently we have an attribute switchType in IS and IL which seem to be redundant. For the purpose in IL to distinguish
particluar relations we have found the following matches to IS making the attribute unnecessary in IL:

simpleSwitch <=> ordinarySwitch/insideCurvedSwitch/outsideCurvedSwitch without relatedMovableElement
simpleSwitch <=> ordinarySwitch/insideCurvedSwitch/outsideCurvedSwitch + relatedMovableElement (derailer)
coupledSwitch <=> ordinarySwitch/insideCurvedSwitch/outsideCurvedSwitch + relatedMovableElement (switch)
doubleSlipSwitch <=> doubleSwitchCrossing
singleSlipSwitch <=> simpleSwitchCrossing

Would you agree to remove the switchType in IL?

--
Regards,
Jörg von Lingen - Interlocking Coordinator
 
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Include track length information in topology
Next Topic: Double switch crossing: 'crossingRef' attribute for the fictive switches
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jul 23 13:38:05 CEST 2024