What is the rationale for multiple <assetsForIL>s? [message #2060] |
Fri, 28 December 2018 23:00 |
Thomas Nygreen JBD
Messages: 68 Registered: February 2017
|
Member |
|
|
Dear all,
I cannot find any documentation of what should determine which assets that go into which <assetForIL>. I assume that there is a reason why the schema allows multiple <assetsForIL>s, but I cannot find that reason in the drafted tutorial or in the forum.
What is the rationale for multiple <assetsForIL>s? If we look to the infrastructure domain, the closest relative to <assetForIL> is <functionalInfrastructure>, which does not multiply. So why not remove <assetsForILs> and have only one <assetsForIL>?
Best regards,
Thomas Nygreen
|
|
|