Home » railML newsgroups » railml.rollingstock » Rollingstock - modelling patterns
Re: Rollingstock - modelling patterns [message #2018 is a reply to message #2016] Thu, 22 November 2018 10:23 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Dirk Bräuer is currently offline  Dirk Bräuer
Messages: 311
Registered: August 2008
Senior Member
Dear Jörg,

> 1) What do you think about hierarchy issue concerning a perspective RS in railML3?

I think a flat hierarchy is not more practical especially in a very 'technical' context. I already have often the problem of needing to 'jump' very often in the railML files (when reading manually) to resolve references. Sometimes I loose overview...

So, I would prefer the rather deep but contextual hierarchy we already have.

Additionally, when I made the suggestion of a possible generic model for future <TT> (with a very flat hierarchy), it was widely refused because of too less structure. So, I am probably (obviously) not the only one with this opinion.

Best regards,
Dirk.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: missing minOccurs="0" for <trainBrakeOperation>
Next Topic: Description of values for powerType, transmission, controlType of RS:propulsion
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Tue May 07 01:12:32 CEST 2024