Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » Platform element location: is it really necessary? (How to specify a platform location in absence of mesoscopic/macroscopic description)
Platform element location: is it really necessary? [message #1999] Mon, 29 October 2018 12:17 Go to previous message
Fabiana Diotallevi is currently offline  Fabiana Diotallevi
Messages: 21
Registered: October 2018
Junior Member
Dear all,
I was wondering if, in case of a single station representation, the mesoscopic/macroscopic description can be neglected, since there are no other lines or stations to link it to.

In particular, for what I see in the simpleExample documentation, the functionalInfrastructure element "Platform" has to be connected to a mesoscopic element (ne_a11), while the relative elements "PlatformEdge" are connected to microscopic elements (ne_a01 and ne_a02).

Do we really the need to specify the location of the Platform element?
Shouldn't the location of the "PlatformEdges" be enough for the determination of the Platform itself?

How can I model a "Platform" element if I don't have a mesoscopic element to refer it to?

Thanks in advance for your feedback,

Fabiana

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Infrastructure Visualization
Next Topic: NetElements vs. Tracks vs. TrainDetectionElements vs. TvdSections
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Mon May 06 11:21:33 CEST 2024