| Re: infrastructure "state" [message #2025 is a reply to message #2010] |
Mon, 26 November 2018 16:28   |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hello Christian,
Am 08.11.2018 um 11:50 schrieb Christian Rößiger:
> [...] To keep the
> consistency between both attributes, I would only add the following
> dependencies to the wiki instead of my previous suggestion:
>
> status = conceptual|planned|disabled|closed -> disabled=true
> status = operational -> disabled=false
>
> Are there any objections / improvements?
since there have been no objections, I recommend to go ahead. Do you
want to add this semantic constraint on the wiki page [1] or do you want
me to do it?
[1] https://wiki.railml.org/index.php?title=IS:state
Best regards
Christian
--
Christian Rahmig - Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Phone Coordinator: +49 173 2714509; railML.org: +49 351 47582911
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railml.org
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
