Forum: railML.infrastructure » infrastructure "state"

Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » infrastructure "state"

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: infrastructure "state" [message #2010 is a reply to message #2009]

Thu, 08 November 2018 11:50

Christian Rößiger
Messages: 62
Registered: March 2015

Member

Dear all,

As I read in https://trac.railml.org/ticket/339, the attribute
"disabled" could not be set to deprecated because it is mandatory.
Therefore it must be kept in railML 2.4 and always be set. To keep the
consistency between both attributes, I would only add the following
dependencies to the wiki instead of my previous suggestion:

status = conceptual|planned|disabled|closed -> disabled=true
status = operational -> disabled=false

Are there any objections / improvements?

Kind regards
Christian Rößiger

Am 08.11.2018 um 09:19 schrieb Christian Rößiger:
> Dear all,
>
> Unfortunately I have only now noticed during the review of the wiki
> pages for the <state> element that there is a new "state" attribute in
> railML2.4 that de facto replaces or extends the previous "disabled"
> attribute. The question for me is how to deal with the old "disabled"
> attribute. It's certainly too late to declare it "deprecated with
> version 2.4" now. Therefore, I would suggest at least to document in the
> wiki that "disabled" and "state" must not have any contradictions. If
> possible, only one of the two attributes should be used at a time.
>
> Kind regards
> Christian Rößiger
>

--
iRFP e. K. · Institut für Regional- und Fernverkehrsplanung
Hochschulstr. 45, 01069 Dresden
Tel. +49 351 4706819 · Fax. +49 351 4768190 · www.irfp.de
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dresden, HRA 9347

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		infrastructure "state" By: christian.rahmig on Thu, 28 June 2018 08:46
		Re: infrastructure "state" By: christian.rahmig on Thu, 30 August 2018 08:50
		Re: infrastructure "state" By: Tobias Bregulla on Thu, 30 August 2018 16:49
		Re: infrastructure "state" By: christian.rahmig on Tue, 02 October 2018 12:55
		Re: infrastructure "state" By: Christian Rößiger on Thu, 08 November 2018 09:19
		Re: infrastructure "state" By: Christian Rößiger on Thu, 08 November 2018 11:50
		Re: infrastructure "state" By: christian.rahmig on Mon, 26 November 2018 16:28
		Re: infrastructure "state" By: Thomas Nygreen JBD on Mon, 03 December 2018 16:36
		Re: infrastructure "state" By: christian.rahmig on Wed, 19 December 2018 15:33

Previous Topic:	Use of <bufferStop>
Next Topic:	<track>@mainDir

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon May 06 22:30:42 CEST 2024