Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » infrastructure "state"
Re: infrastructure "state" [message #1933 is a reply to message #1858] Thu, 30 August 2018 08:50 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear all,

in a first step of re-newing the data structure for modelling the
infrastructure state, the existing solution from OCP and from
infrastructure element shall be harmonized with upcoming railML 2.4.

OCP status is modelled:

<ocp ...>
<propOther @status="planned">
</ocp>

Further enumeration values are:
* operational
* disabled
* closed

The railML infrastructure element (e.g. levelCrossing) has a different
way of modelling states:

<levelCrossing ...>
<states>
<state disabled="true" operatingPeriodRef="..."/>
</states>
</levelCrossing>

Bringing both concepts together would strengthen the state modelling in
infrastructure. I therefore filed a ticket [1] for this issue that can
be realized quite quickly.

Any comments are appreciated...

[1] https://trac.railml.org/ticket/339

Best regards
Christian

--
Christian Rahmig - Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Phone Coordinator: +49 173 2714509; railML.org: +49 351 47582911
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railml.org


Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Use of <bufferStop>
Next Topic: <track>@mainDir
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon May 06 22:01:00 CEST 2024