Home » railML newsgroups » railml.rollingstock » speedProfile and rolling stock
Re: speedProfile and rolling stock [message #1884 is a reply to message #1859] Fri, 03 August 2018 05:21 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Joerg von Lingen is currently offline  Joerg von Lingen
Messages: 148
Registered: May 2011
Senior Member
Dear all,

Concerning proposed speed profiles in RS:
I don't see the need to have speed profiles for single vehicles. It is always intended to use formations for use as
"running rolling stock" like for TT.
Thus it would be sufficient to have this information at the formation element only. The additional element can only be
optional, otherwise it won't be compatible with 2.3.

Concerning hierarchy of "duplicate" information in different subschema:
With the example speed profile the priority would be in TT except the formation or track allows only a more restrictive
profile. Thus in the basic definition of speed profiles in IS a priority level for fallback shall be included or can be
possibly concluded.

In any case it has to be defined which reference information prevail, if ref and name are given but contradictionary. I
would suggest the name.

Regards,
Dr.-Ing. Jörg von Lingen - Rollingstock scheme coordinator

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Suggestion towards new attributes and sub element for <doors>
Next Topic: new values for places and service
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri May 17 11:19:23 CEST 2024