Forum: railML.infrastructure » [railML 3.1] border types

Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » [railML 3.1] border types

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: [railML 3.1] border types [message #2718 is a reply to message #2694]

Wed, 19 May 2021 07:52

Torben Brand
Messages: 158
Registered: March 2016

Senior Member

When using the (in railML2.5 suggested new in railML3 exisiting) element <area> with type="project" this would be redundant. but as the use of border@type is mandatory, we suggest to use the existing type="area" to reference to the area, when in use.

But you can also have the need to define stand-alone project borders without an area (when an area is open or not defined clearly). So we still suggest to introduce the new value border@type="project".

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[railML 3.1] border types By: christian.rahmig on Thu, 24 May 2018 18:52
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: Thomas Nygreen JBD on Tue, 29 May 2018 18:45
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: Joerg von Lingen on Sat, 02 June 2018 17:21
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: christian.rahmig on Mon, 04 June 2018 15:25
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: Thomas Nygreen JBD on Thu, 07 June 2018 16:56
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: Joerg von Lingen on Sun, 26 August 2018 08:57
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: Torben Brand on Fri, 09 April 2021 09:57
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: christian.rahmig on Fri, 09 April 2021 15:07
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: Torben Brand on Wed, 19 May 2021 07:52
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: christian.rahmig on Fri, 21 May 2021 16:14
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: Dirk Bräuer on Tue, 21 August 2018 18:10

Previous Topic:	[railML2] adding an attribute for clearance on switches and crossings.
Next Topic:	railML 2.3 infrastructure extension proposal tunnel resistance factor

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed May 15 17:31:49 CEST 2024