| Re: [railML 3.1] border types [message #2694 is a reply to message #2690] |
Fri, 09 April 2021 15:07   |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Torben,
for railML 2.5 it is proposed to have a (generic) area element and to define the area borders using references from this area element to <border> elements of type "area". This means, that a border of a project area is modelled in the same manner like a border of a working area.
So, the question is: Is it necessary ot distinguish between different area type borders or is it sufficient to distinguish between different types of areas inside an <area> element? What is the added value of writing <border type="project"> instead of <border type="area"> when the referenced object (<area> element) is the same?
Any opinions from the community are highly appreciated.
Best regards
Christian
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
