Forum: railML.infrastructure » [railML 3.1] border types

Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » [railML 3.1] border types

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: [railML 3.1] border types [message #1819 is a reply to message #1810]

Sat, 02 June 2018 17:21

Joerg von Lingen
Messages: 148
Registered: May 2011

Senior Member

Hi,

if you have something in mind which is temporarily in use and
activated/deactivated by an interlocking then it shall be defined in
interlocking schema. There we have thought about "RestrictedAreas" especially for:
- Working zones
- local shunting areas
- ETCS shunting areas
- permission zones

Dr.-Ing. Jörg von Lingen - Interlocking scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Phone Coordinator: +49 351 87759 40; railML.org: +49 351 47582911
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railml.org
On 29.05.2018 18:45, Thomas Nygreen wrote:
> In Norway we discussed just a week or two ago if <border>s
> were suitable for specifying shunting areas etc. in
> stations. Would this kind of use be in line with what the
> element is intended for? Two questions we had was how to
> group borders together to actually form an area, and how to
> specify what kind of area it is. The former can be solved by
> using a common name for all borders of the same area, and
> the latter by using type="other:...", but creating a way to
> group borders together by IDREF seems preferable.
>
> This is also one of the elements where it is difficult to
> understand the semantics of the dir attribute. Can a border
> exist in only one direction?

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[railML 3.1] border types By: christian.rahmig on Thu, 24 May 2018 18:52
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: Thomas Nygreen JBD on Tue, 29 May 2018 18:45
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: Joerg von Lingen on Sat, 02 June 2018 17:21
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: christian.rahmig on Mon, 04 June 2018 15:25
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: Thomas Nygreen JBD on Thu, 07 June 2018 16:56
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: Joerg von Lingen on Sun, 26 August 2018 08:57
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: Torben Brand on Fri, 09 April 2021 09:57
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: christian.rahmig on Fri, 09 April 2021 15:07
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: Torben Brand on Wed, 19 May 2021 07:52
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: christian.rahmig on Fri, 21 May 2021 16:14
		Re: [railML 3.1] border types By: Dirk Bräuer on Tue, 21 August 2018 18:10

Previous Topic:	[railML2] adding an attribute for clearance on switches and crossings.
Next Topic:	railML 2.3 infrastructure extension proposal tunnel resistance factor

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed May 15 02:27:07 CEST 2024