Home » railML newsgroups » railml.rollingstock » new values for places and service (new values for places and service)
Re: new values for places and service [message #1960 is a reply to message #1893] Fri, 14 September 2018 10:40 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Torben Brand is currently offline  Torben Brand
Messages: 158
Registered: March 2016
Senior Member
Final questions when it comes to <places>:

stroller
The stroller (Kinderwagen) which we suggested to name category="stroller" is not in the enumeration list. Instead there is the value "toddler" In the wiki is explained as:
• toddler This is used for identifying the capacity of seats in the vehicle in compartments for babys and toddlers.
• toddlerCompartment This is used for identifying the number of compartments for babys and toddlers.

Do these seats exist? Is there a need for baby seats? Usually they sit in the lap of their parents or lay in the stroller (thus the need to define how many strollers can fit in the train in designated areas).
What to do?
1. keep «toddler» and «toddlerCompartment" as is and
a. add "stroller" with definition "number of strollers that can fit in the train in designated areas"
b. the Norwegian sector shall use "other:stroller" with definition "number of strollers that can fit in the train in designated areas"
2. keep «toddler» and «toddlerCompartment", but change wiki and xsd definition to "number of strollers that can fit in the train in designated areas" and "number of designated areas for strollers"
3. remove «toddler» and «toddlerCompartment" from XSD and wiki and add "stroller" and "strollerCompartment" to XSD and wiki (no need for strollerCompartment from Norway) .Should be OK since the values were added in a beta and RC phase.
I'm in favor of choice 3. If this is not implemented by the coordinator the Norwegian sector will go for option 1b.

standing
Our capacity need for distinguishing between different quality levels for "standing" was dismissed by Dirk. The Scheme coordinator has not taken a stand on this. Shall we use the values:
"other:standingCategoryA", "other:standingCategoryB" and "other:standingCategoryC" ? This is fine by me.

StandingArea
For capacity assessment needs we need to be able to calculate with the standingArea when all folding seats are up (current implementation definition), but also the reduced area when they all are folded down. As this seems very specific we will make use of "other:standingAreaReduced".

[Updated on: Fri, 14 September 2018 10:42]

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: speedProfile and rolling stock
Next Topic: need for new element stopingActivity time
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 02 19:23:36 CEST 2024