| Re: Representation of operational stations [message #1853 is a reply to message #1748] |
Fri, 22 June 2018 12:34   |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear all,
let me summarize the current proposal for changing the OCP traffic type
as formulated in Trac ticket #328 [1]:
* adding new value "operational"
Further, I want to direct your focus on the new wiki page [2] about
different types of OCPs. Although the examples describe the situation in
Germany, they provide a very good insight in specific modelling of
different types of OCPs. Thank you very much, Dirk and Mr. Leberl, for
this contribution!
My question to Tobias (and all others that have a need for it):
Looking at the explanations in [2], do you still agree with current
proposal of Trac ticket #328 to be implemented with railML 2.4 or would
you like to change it? In particular: Does the "Betriebsbahnhof" (en:
loop and/or overtaking track with no passanger nor freight access) fit
to what you originally intended to model and are you satisfied with the
solution described in the wiki?
[1] https://trac.railml.org/ticket/328
[2] https://wiki.railml.org/index.php?title=Dev:Types_of_ocps
As usual I am looking forward to receiving your comments...
Best regards
Christian
--
Christian Rahmig - Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Phone Coordinator: +49 173 2714509; railML.org: +49 351 47582911
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railml.org
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
