Forum: RailTopoModel » Reference to PositioningSystem

Home » RailTopoModel newsgroup » RailTopoModel » Reference to PositioningSystem

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Reference to PositioningSystem [message #1953 is a reply to message #1905]

Tue, 04 September 2018 11:34

Airy Magnien
Messages: 18
Registered: September 2016

Junior Member

Back to the question. After review with RTM experts and talkback with C. Rahmig, this is where we are:
Role 'positioningSystem' of class AssociatedPositioningSystem shall be made optional (cardinality 0..1 instead of 1). This leaves the possibility to omit redundant info. However it is not clear why this redundancy would cause a genuine problem. Our compromise solution is:

- We insist that the relation shall me maintained, because it embodies the meaning of the AssociatedPositioningSystem class;
- We recommend to use this redundancy for consistency checking;
- We demand not to mix coordinates referring to different positioning systems in one same composition, because this is why the class "AssociatedPositioningSystem" has been introduced in the first place.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Reference to PositioningSystem By: christian.rahmig on Mon, 12 March 2018 17:55
		Re: Reference to PositioningSystem By: christian.rahmig on Wed, 04 July 2018 06:57
		Re: Reference to PositioningSystem By: Airy Magnien on Thu, 16 August 2018 11:57
		Re: Reference to PositioningSystem By: christian.rahmig on Thu, 16 August 2018 13:42
		Re: Reference to PositioningSystem By: Airy Magnien on Thu, 16 August 2018 14:42
		Re: Reference to PositioningSystem By: Airy Magnien on Tue, 04 September 2018 11:34
		Re: Reference to PositioningSystem By: christian.rahmig on Mon, 17 September 2018 13:19

Previous Topic:	Lateral location of elements
Next Topic:	Network location

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri May 03 08:33:44 CEST 2024