Home » railML newsgroups » railml.common » More concise usage of namespaces
Re: More concise usage of namespaces [message #2034 is a reply to message #1699] Tue, 11 December 2018 12:35 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Torben Brand is currently offline  Torben Brand
Messages: 158
Registered: March 2016
Senior Member
I agree to the cleanup.
But i understand Dev: as «development» not as common descriptions/ general
guidelines. There are multiple Dev: pages that i see as development
suggestions and NOT as comunity consensus. For that purpose the pages make
sense
I see the use case for a label for items that span multiple schemas and we
also have and need development pages.

We should choose betwen the following model for the page structure:
A. Use «Dev:» as today for everything not an element or use case. But
clearly mark the pages as beeing a cross schema description or a
development page.

B. Move all «Dev:» pages with development into the Wiki «Discussion» tab
pages (which are little used today) and

B1 keep all cross schema description pages in «Dev:»

B3 rename the remaining «Dev:» pages with cross schema description into
«Desc:»

C. Split the current Dev: pages into:
1. «Dev:» for development page
2. «Desc:» for «Descriptive page» for pages with a cross schema
description.

D. Add a page label «CL:» for «code list» which will become more and more
important.

I suggest to go for option B (either B1 or B2) with also D as nice to have.

--
TOBR

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: SI units in railML 3.x
Next Topic: scheme location to be adressed via HTTPS instead of HTTP
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat May 04 03:19:28 CEST 2024