Forum: railml.common » SI units in railML 3.x

Home » railML newsgroups » railml.common » SI units in railML 3.x

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: SI units in railML 3.x [message #1808 is a reply to message #1801]

Tue, 29 May 2018 16:39

Joerg von Lingen
Messages: 148
Registered: May 2011

Senior Member

Dear all,

yes, the tEffortNewton shall be transformed to tForceNewton. In the end it is
the same definition with the unit Newton.

Best regards,
Joerg v. Lingen

Rollingstock Coordinator

On 22.05.2018 16:03, Dirk Bräuer wrote:
> I regard tEffortNewton as a mistake and think it should be unified to tForceNewton in future.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		SI units in railML 3.x By: Vasco Paul Kolmorgen on Mon, 15 January 2018 11:07
		Re: SI units in railML 3.x By: Dirk Bräuer on Tue, 16 January 2018 21:15
		Re: SI units in railML 3.x By: Ferri Leberl on Tue, 22 May 2018 14:34
		Re: SI units in railML 3.x By: Dirk Bräuer on Tue, 22 May 2018 16:03
		Re: SI units in railML 3.x By: Joerg von Lingen on Tue, 29 May 2018 16:39
		Re: SI units in railML 3.x By: Ferri Leberl on Sun, 25 November 2018 11:49
		Re: SI units in railML 3.x By: Thomas Nygreen JBD on Thu, 20 December 2018 16:23

Previous Topic:	Define requirements for processContent strictly than lax
Next Topic:	More concise usage of namespaces

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Apr 28 00:08:54 CEST 2024