Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » Semantic of @type in <track> and mapping to national usage?
Re: Semantic of @type in <track> and mapping to national usage? [message #1629 is a reply to message #1596] Mon, 21 August 2017 15:10 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Lukáš Fiala is currently offline  Lukáš Fiala
Messages: 1
Registered: August 2017
Junior Member
Dear Vasco.

According to operation a signalling regulation (Dopravní a návěstní
předpis - SŽDC D1) http://provoz.szdc.cz/Portal/ViewArticle.aspx?oid=136
we divide tracks into two categories:
- CZ: traťové koleje / EN: line tracks / DE: Streckengleise
- staniční koleje / EN: station tracks / DE: Bahnhofsgleise
Station limits are the same as in Germany. For stations equipped by main
signals are at the home signals and for stations without main signals
are at the trapezoidal boards (like "Trapeztafel" in German).

Depending on the purpose of use:
- Dopravní koleje / EN: traffic tracks / DE: Betriebsgleise are used for
train movements
- Manipulační koleje / EN: siding track / DE: Nebengleise are used for
shunting movements only

Station tracks
- Hlavní kolej / EN: main track / DE: Hauptgleis is traffic track and it
is direct continuation of line track. Usually has the same number with
line track.
- Spojovací kolej / EN: connecting track / DE: ? is track connecting
different parts of the station, if there is not line track between them.
Connecting track could be either traffic track or siding track.
- Kolejová spojka / EN: track or switch connection / DE: ? - is short
track connection between two turnouts (switches) of neighbouring tracks.

Best regards

Ing. Lukáš Fiala

Správa železniční dopravní cesty, státní organizace
Generální ředitelství

Odbor základního řízení provozu
Oddělení technické

Křižíkova 522/2, 186 00 PRAHA 8
www.szdc.cz ¨

Am 06.06.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Vasco Paul Kolmorgen:
> Dear IS-Community,
>
> following the rules for the Discussion pages (see
> http://wiki.railml.org/index.php?title=Dev:Wiki_Documentatio n_Guidelines#Discussion_Pages)
> i have to move the existing discussion about semantic of @type in
> <track> and the mapping to national usage to this forum.
>
> ....
>
> Any opinions for railML® 2.x and for a refactoring in railML® 3.x?
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: SI units in railML 3.x
Next Topic: Maximum train current - Proposal for extension of infrastructure scheme in railML 2.4
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Apr 29 19:40:40 CEST 2024