| Re: [railML3|alpha] Modelling of track conditions [message #1438 is a reply to message #1433] |
Tue, 08 November 2016 05:57  |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Martin,
Am 31.10.2016 um 13:57 schrieb Martin Karlsson:
> [...]
> I would prefer if these track conditions were instead
> modelled in the "operation" section, as subclasses of
> OperationalEntity.
Thank you for your feedback on this part of the model. Based on your
reasoning and the feedback I got in Paris from other users, I confirm
that the current approach of track parameter modelling is not very
useful although it is very similar to the "infraAttrGroups approach" of
current railML v2.x. Therefore, the parameter groups will be moved to
the asset and operational sections of the model an follow the generic
approach of location referencing provided by the RailTopoModel base.
Best regards
--
Christian Rahmig
railML.infrastructure coordinator
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
