| Re: IRS 30100 wording remarks [message #1398 is a reply to message #1374] |
Fri, 19 August 2016 16:14   |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Felix!
Your points were analysed by members of the RTM expert group. The
question concerning "ch 6.3.7, 2nd sentence" seems to be a
misunderstanding and will be addressed by clarifying the documentation.
The other items will be updated along your line of reasoning.
Best regards
Christian
Am 23.06.2016 um 21:28 schrieb Felix Prüter:
> Hello,
> here are some more wording remarks to the IRS 30100:
>
> p.30, last note:
> the part after the last comma seems superfluously
>
> ch 6.2.11, z2nd par:
> the description about the relation between
> PositioningNetElement und AssociatedPositioningElement is
> wrong.
> APS is contained by PNE!
>
> ch 6.3.6:
> defines the generic concept of a coordinate in a POSITIONING
> (not referencing) system
>
> ch 6.3.7, 2nd sentence:
> Should be two sentences
> 1. value range of attribute intrinsicCoord 0..1
> 2. Arbitrary amount of associated
> PositioningSystemCoordinate instances
>
> ch 6.4.5:
> in reference to one OR MORE PositioningNetElement
> according to Figure 72 only ONE!
>
> ch 6.4.5:
> Attribute applicationDirection: direction of the
> LINEARLOCATION?
> better: LinearElement?
>
> ch 6.4.9:
> between a LinearLocation and PositioningSystemCoordinate
> INSTANCES (is missing)
>
> Kind regards
> Felix
> SIGNON Deutschland GmbH
>
--
Christian Rahmig
railML.infrastructure coordinator
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
