| Re: AssociatedNetElement [message #1403 is a reply to message #1376] |
Fri, 19 August 2016 16:29  |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Felix!
The wording is unclear indeed. It will be reformulated.
Best regards
Christian
Am 23.06.2016 um 18:17 schrieb Felix Prüter:
> Hello,
> in this chapter it's stated:
>
> ..in relation BETWEEN NetElement instances...
> between which ones? between the NetElements belonging to one
> AreaLocation?
>
> ..in relation between ONE NetElement instance and location
> information for NetEntity instances
> from my point of view, the modeling in Figure 43 describes
> it vice versa
>
> the value ranges for intrinsicCoordBegin/End in Table (named
> Figure 42 - why?) are missing
> should be [0...1], right?
>
> Attribute keeps___Orientation (superfluous space in table):
> What parent-child-relation is meant here?
> When this corresponds to the relation coming from element
> aggrgation via ElemenPartCollection, is this the right place
> to specifiy this attribute?
>
> Kind regards
> Felix
> SIGNON Deutschland GmbH
>
--
Christian Rahmig
railML.infrastructure coordinator
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
