Re: roles [message #1148 is a reply to message #1146] |
Tue, 12 February 2013 13:10 |
Joachim Rubröder railML
Messages: 0 Registered: November 2019
|
|
|
|
Hi,
> +1 for infrastructureManager and vehicleManufacturer. Regarding the
> vehicleOperator, I would think that binding to trainPart should be
> possible for the case that at a certain planning stage, formations are
> abstract but the assignment to the operator is already known.
We are getting closer. The proper binding list for a trainPart now looks
like that:
* vehicleOperater
* customer
* railwayUndertaking
* operationalUndertaking
* concessionaire
* contractor (general usage)
* any (extensions)
Kind regards,
Joachim
-------------------------------------
Joachim Rubröder
Schema Coordinator: railML.timetable
--
----== posted via PHP Headliner ==----
|
|
|