Home » railML newsgroups » railml.common » roles
Re: roles [message #1148 is a reply to message #1146] Tue, 12 February 2013 13:10 Go to previous message
Joachim Rubröder railML is currently offline  Joachim Rubröder railML
Messages: 0
Registered: November 2019
Hi,

> +1 for infrastructureManager and vehicleManufacturer. Regarding the
> vehicleOperator, I would think that binding to trainPart should be
> possible for the case that at a certain planning stage, formations are
> abstract but the assignment to the operator is already known.

We are getting closer. The proper binding list for a trainPart now looks
like that:

* vehicleOperater
* customer
* railwayUndertaking
* operationalUndertaking
* concessionaire
* contractor (general usage)
* any (extensions)

Kind regards,
Joachim

-------------------------------------
Joachim Rubröder
Schema Coordinator: railML.timetable




--
----== posted via PHP Headliner ==----
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Identification in the XML list files and its references (was: small issues on "register" and "tLineInfrastructureManagerCode")
Next Topic: railML Trac hosting?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 09 02:40:56 CEST 2024