Home » railML newsgroups » railml.common » roles
Re: roles [message #1134 is a reply to message #1133] Mon, 12 November 2012 20:19 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Dirk Bräuer is currently offline  Dirk Bräuer
Messages: 311
Registered: August 2008
Senior Member
> I really prefer the pre-defined element list with the background of
> systematic XML validation options.

That is the point.

Your pre-defined element list: Cannot be extended easily if someone wants
to have a new type.
My generic element list with enumeration attribute "type": Can easily be
extended by using "other:...".

> I already asked for the difference between 'contractor' and 'partner'
> but got no satisfactory answer.

It is not a matter of a possible difference between 'contractor' and
'partner'. These should have been simple naming examples.

I do not want to discuss the different types relationships. I'ld like to
have an enumeration which one could extend without asking a scheme
coordinator.

Dirk.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Identification in the XML list files and its references (was: small issues on "register" and "tLineInfrastructureManagerCode")
Next Topic: railML Trac hosting?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed May 08 08:15:09 CEST 2024