| Re: roles [message #1135 is a reply to message #1132] |
Tue, 13 November 2012 08:48   |
Andreas Tanner
Messages: 52
Registered: March 2012
|
Member |
|
|
ese dates are anchored in the
>> common part, I would understand that the /licence/ or similar of those
>> units is restricted. But probably, what one wants to restrict is the
>> /binding/. So I would move the restriction to that location.
>
> Yes, thanks for pointing this out. Let's drop the dates, too.
>
> Kind regards...
> Susanne
>
The requirement of a date was brought in by Joerg von Lingen. I would
not drop it but anchor it with the binding. Otherwise, to me the
proposal looks fine. We should agree on a list of "predefined" roles
(the subelements of <organizationalUnits>) that are sufficiently
general, including their German pendants and a description for the wiki.
Here is a suggestion:
contractor (Auftraggeber) : The authority or enterprise that ordered the
transportation service, i.e., an integrated transit system
railwayUndertaking (Verkehrsunternehmen) : The undertaking that is
commercially responsible for the service
vehicleOperator, in IVU language this would be subcontractor
(Fremdunternehmer) : The railway undertaking that operates the vehicle,
if different from the one that is responsible for the commercial service
- concessionaire (Konzessionsinhaber) ?? Not sure, we use it for bus
transport.
- operator (Betreiber) - the unit that is responsible for the
operational planning of this service
infrastructureManager (Infrastrukturbetreiber) ...
vehicleManufacturer (Fahrzeughersteller) ...
Best, Andreas.
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
