Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » infrastructure train path: where to put path parameters
Re: infrastructure train path: where to put path parameters [message #936 is a reply to message #915] Tue, 12 March 2013 19:38 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Dirk Bräuer is currently offline  Dirk Bräuer
Messages: 311
Registered: August 2008
Senior Member
Dear Andreas,

what do you mean with "path properties"?

For the state of a train (whether it is ordered, published, invoiced...)
currently there is <trainPart>."processStatus". We did not find its
pre-defined values very helpful, so we use a lot of "other:..." values
with it.

I also would have preferred it at <trainPartSequence> rather than at
<trainPart>. But the original intention was to consequently put everything
into <trainParts> as the real "atoms" of trains. And since I am also a
friend of consequence, I did not invent. I think it is not redundancy:
Sometimes we have different operators for two train parts at the same
<trainPartSequence>, e. g. EB and STB run coupled between Erfurt and
Plaue. One could imagine that there are different states of the
<trainParts> even at the same section: One has already payed its invoice
(processStatus="payed"), the other not (processStatus="invoiced,
reminded...") ;-)

A formationRef is already there at <trainPart>. It is a reference to a
vehicle formation.

Best regards,
Dirk.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: circulations should be optional
Next Topic: problems with <train>s: uniqueness constraints, scope
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat May 11 07:27:08 CEST 2024