Forum: railml.timetable » circulations should be optional

Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » circulations should be optional

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: circulations should be optional [message #933 is a reply to message #924]

Tue, 12 March 2013 18:25

Dirk Bräuer
Messages: 311
Registered: August 2008

Senior Member

Dear Andreas and Joachim,

I also see no objections against optional circulations (i. e. rosterings
with blocks but without circulations) and would prefer this against
additional blocks at <timetable> but outside <rosterings>. Concerning the
latter, it seams to me that we could skip that redundancy.

Best regards,
Dirk.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		circulations should be optional By: Andreas Tanner on Wed, 02 January 2013 10:29
		Re: circulations should be optional By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Tue, 12 February 2013 16:55
		Re: circulations should be optional By: Andreas Tanner on Wed, 13 February 2013 08:37
		Re: circulations should be optional By: Dirk Bräuer on Tue, 12 March 2013 18:25

Previous Topic:	train annotations
Next Topic:	infrastructure train path: where to put path parameters

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed May 15 00:36:43 CEST 2024