| Re: A train with ETCS? [message #821 is a reply to message #819] |
Thu, 11 October 2012 22:17   |
Dirk Bräuer
Messages: 311
Registered: August 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Susanne,
Am 10.10.2012, 13:12 Uhr, schrieb Susanne Wunsch <coord(at)commonrailmlorg>:
> train/trainPartSequence/equipmentUsage offers the possibility to define
> multiple "equipment"s. I mean that there is no need to define the
> securing policy for each system, it would be enough to enable ETCS at
> this place.
I agree.
> We could add an "etcs" element with its attributes "aETCS" (from
> Rollingstock), but then there is no information about an STM, the ETCS
> could interact with.
Not necessary from my side. For the purposes of timetabling, it is
interesting only whether the train operates with a certain train
protection system on the line or not. It is not necessary why or "where
does it come from". (If we do want to allow this anyway, we can solve it
later with a more general solution.)
> Otherwise the STMs would be defined as a "national
> system" like already done with the "type" attribute.
I agree.
> How about the above approach?
I would prefer one small addition:
<equipmentUsage>
<equipment type="ETCS" uses="true">
<etcs level0="true" level1="true"/>
</equipment>
</equipmentUsage>
--> The <etcs> element could be skipped if the level is not known.
--> Better readability / easier self-description.
Would be good to have it in 2.2.
Thank you,
Dirk.
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
