Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss [message #958 is a reply to message #878] |
Mon, 02 December 2013 12:26 |
Joachim Rubröder railML
Messages: 0 Registered: November 2019
|
|
|
|
Hi,
in order to solve this issue we will prevent (by documentation) to have
two times the same ocpTT within one trainPart.
https://trac.assembla.com/railML/ticket/235
Kind regards,
Joachim
-------------------------------------
Joachim Rubröder
Schema Coordinator: railML.timetable
Dirk Bräuer wrote:
>
>> But the train arrives Köln-Mülheim the second time "orientation
>> reversed", doesn't it?
>
> No, it does not. The fist and the carriages are still the same. The
> orientation of a formation currently refers to its running direction but
> not to a geographic direction nor a mileage direction.
>
>> It would be interesting to
>> see it in railML without splitting into two train parts. Which problems
>> may occur regarding the timetable in general and rostering in special?
>
> So far: None. There already are these cases in practice including
> circulation plans w/o problems. There is no reference to an <ocpTT> in
> RailML so far so that's why two <ocpTT> may refer to the same <ocp> w/o
> problems.
>
> Dirk.
>
>
--
----== posted via PHP Headliner ==----
|
|
|
|
|
RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Sep 08 01:59:34 CEST 2024
|