Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss [message #877 is a reply to message #876] |
Fri, 09 November 2012 17:18 |
Susanne Wunsch railML
Messages: 0 Registered: January 2020
|
|
|
|
Dear Dirk and others,
Dirk Bräuer <dirkbraeuer(at)irfpde> writes:
> The night train Amsterdam - Warsaw does not reverse at Köln Hbf: It
> goes Düsseldorf - (line #2650) - Köln-Mülheim - Köln-Deutz -
> (Hohenzollernbrücke) - Köln Hbf - Köln West - Köln Süd - (Südbrücke) -
> Köln-Kalk - Köln-Mülheim - (line #2730) - Wuppertal.
>
> So it passes two times through Köln-Mülheim and neighboring OCPs
> without reversing between. (Actually, the aim of the action is to
> avoid reversing.)
But the train arrives Köln-Mülheim the second time "orientation
reversed", doesn't it? Though we nevertheless have to indicate that
aspect. :-(
> Current train no. is EN 446/447. Current times are:
> 446: KKM 6.08 - 6.14 KK 6.17 - KKM 6.35
> 447: KKM 22.19 - 22.25 KK 22.28 - KKM 22.46
>
> The interesting thing is: It actually does not go _back_ on its way
> back... It always makes the circle anti-clockwise, never clockwise. So
> both the trains to Amsterdam and Warsaw leave Köln Hbf in
> north-westerly direction.
>
> I'm aware that it has nothing to do with connections. It should only
> clarify that nowadays a train may pass a station twice, even without
> reversing. Concerning the connections, we seam to get a different
> solution.
Thank you for contributing this nice example. It would be interesting to
see it in railML without splitting into two train parts. Which problems
may occur regarding the timetable in general and rostering in special? I
currently would expect none, but there are every time surprises in the
details. ;-)
Kind regards...
Susanne
--
Susanne Wunsch
Schema Coordinator: railML.common
|
|
|
|
|
RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Sep 08 03:23:50 CEST 2024
|